To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Performance
Shortly after pre-running got occurred, the eye path analysis was checked to own outliers (investigation products larger than step 1.five times brand new interquartile variety to have confirmed variable), by exploring boxplots. The outlying research factors (letter = 19) was basically omitted for private investigation points into the eye-tracking actions , including cuatro.22% of complete studies.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig 2) (ignoring county nervousness) and roentgen (15) = -.499, p = .041 (dealing with to have state nervousness).
Discover no significant matchmaking between LSAS scores and you can basic fixation course for the looks, roentgen (23) = -.141, p = .521 which was and the situation when handling having condition stress having fun with a partial relationship roentgen (20) = -.133, p =. 556
Protection
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations and indicated that when dealing with having state stress, there can be zero significant dating between the LSAS results and you may live time for you to the head roentgen (25) = -.063, p = .756, your body r (27) = -.090, p = .643, therefore the records r (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
Hyperscanning
An effective inverse relationship is actually receive anywhere between scanpath length and you can LSAS rating, roentgen (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever ignoring state anxiety, and you will remained when condition nervousness try regulated for roentgen (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig step three).
A robust negative relationship is receive anywhere between full saccade matter and you can LSAS score, r (29) = -.511, p = .005 when disregarding condition anxiety, and this stayed extreme an as soon as state anxiety are controlled getting roentgen (26) = -.516, p = .005. Zero dating was found anywhere between imply saccade amplitude and you can LSAS get not, roentgen (29) = -.176, p = Aubrey TX sugar babies.362 even in the event county nervousness try regulated for r (26) = -.160, p = .417
