Note that so it possibilities is actually susceptible to a continuous RFC, T18691

• Task Graph
• Mentions
• Copies

Knowledge Schedule

Apparently the form questions was solved additionally the execution was not as much as remark. Should the RFC getting booked to own dialogue in the TechCom?

Obviously the form inquiries are fixed while the execution is actually less than review. Should the RFC feel scheduled having discussion in the TechCom?

18+ discuter

1. This new proposal throughout the task breakdown is pretty distinct from just what could have been accompanied. For this to advance once the an RFC, work description has to be up-to-date in order to mirror that which we seem to be considering.
2. We do not know if this might be proposed purely while the a third class ability, or for deployment for the WMF possibilities. When it is for just 3rd people, it may not even you need a keen RFC, and may also maybe be done as the an expansion also. When it is getting WMF manufacturing, we will have to appear carefully towards the implications to own caching and you can overall performance.

Apparently the shape concerns is resolved and execution was lower than comment. Should the RFC end up being planned to possess conversation in the TechCom?

18+ discuter

1. The new proposition throughout the task dysfunction is fairly distinctive from what has been then followed. For this to advance because the an enthusiastic RFC, the task malfunction must be upgraded so you can mirror what we are usually looking at.
2. Do not determine if that is advised purely because a 3rd people feature, and for implementation on WMF assistance. When it is just for third events, may possibly not also you would like an enthusiastic RFC, and can even maybe be performed due to the fact an expansion as well. If it’s to possess WMF design, we will see to seem very closely toward implications for caching and you will show.

W.r.t. #1 – The form features actually evolved quite a bit once we performs with toward part anchor a great deal more practical and you can user-friendly. We can change the fresh malfunction of the RFC. #2 – Really does “deployment on the WMF assistance” mean while making which part of MediaWiki center app? I think it offers long been the brand new expectation, that’s the reason it’s experienced of numerous iterations regarding structure, i18n and you can perf improve 🙂 You’ll WMF household members chime into confirm this can be nonetheless the brand new circumstances?

#dos – Do “deployment to your WMF assistance” mean and work out so it section of MediaWiki core application? I think it’s always been the assumption, that is why this has undergone of several iterations out-of structure, i18n and you will perf update 🙂 You are going to WMF household members chime in to prove this is exactly nonetheless the newest instance?

This means permitting it toward at the very least a number of the WMF sites. Whether it’s section of key or an expansion isn’t really thus related. The original RFC has been registered towards the thought of having which enabled toward Wikipedia and you may loved ones, but Let me has specific keyword on that throughout the related WMF anyone.

18+ discuter

1. Do not determine if this is recommended strictly as a 3rd class feature, and for implementation for the WMF possibilities. If it’s for just 3rd parties, may possibly not actually you desire an RFC, and will possibly be done since the an extension as well. If it is for WMF manufacturing, we will see to appear carefully on the implications for caching and efficiency.

Offering a technical direction: the current utilization of this feature relies on particular alter in order to the new Parser efficiency additionally the Body template, and this wanted alter towards key. So you’re able to to complete a comparable into the an extension, indeed there nonetheless should be specific change in the brand new key – particularly to provide the point opinions with the SkinEditSectionLinks hook (for example the change except the genuine adding of your ‘share’ hook would have to go into the key anyway). I believe this is why it creates so much more feel to own it while the a center alter. It’s still configurable as a consequence of $wgEnableSectionHeaderShare internationally, which is off by default. In the event that worthy of try incorrect, no extra logic otherwise JavaScript/CSS info are invoked of the function.