Note that that it capability is at the mercy of an ongoing RFC, T18691

Note that that it capability is at the mercy of an ongoing RFC, T18691

  • Task Chart
  • Mentions
  • Duplicates

Experience Schedule

Evidently the design questions are resolved as well as the execution was under opinion. Should the RFC be planned to possess dialogue on TechCom?

It seems that the form questions try resolved and also the execution is significantly less than feedback. Should the RFC become arranged to possess talk at the TechCom?

18+ discuter

  1. The new proposition regarding the activity description is pretty not the same as just what might have been accompanied. For it to advance due to the fact a keen RFC, work malfunction should be upgraded so you’re able to mirror that which we seem to be thinking about.
  2. We do not know if that is advised purely just like the a third group ability, and for deployment to the WMF assistance. In case it is for just 3rd events, may possibly not even you prefer an enthusiastic RFC, and may maybe be achieved just like the an extension too. In case it is getting WMF production, we will see to appear very closely towards the effects for caching and you may results.

Evidently the form concerns are solved in addition to implementation is around opinion. Should the RFC feel planned getting conversation on TechCom?

18+ discuter

  1. New suggestion about task description is pretty unlike exactly what could have been observed. For this to succeed as a keen RFC, the job breakdown has to be upgraded so you can reflect everything we are generally considering.
  2. We do not know if this is exactly recommended purely as a third cluster feature, and for deployment on the WMF systems. If it’s for only third events, it may not also you desire an enthusiastic RFC, that will possibly be achieved given that an extension also. When it is to own WMF manufacturing, we will have to look carefully into the ramifications to own caching and you can show.

W.r.t. #1 – The form enjoys actually come a long way as we performs having toward area anchor way more usable and you may user friendly. We are able to update the latest malfunction regarding the RFC. #dos – Does “implementation into the WMF options” indicate and also make it section of MediaWiki key application? I do believe it offers long been the newest presumption, which is why it has got been through of numerous iterations out of framework, i18n and you may perf upgrade 🙂 You are going to WMF loved ones chime into confirm this is exactly nevertheless the fresh new case?

#2 – Really does “deployment into the WMF possibilities” mean making that it part of MediaWiki center software? I think it has been the new presumption, for this reason it offers undergone of many iterations out of structure, i18n and you may perf improve 🙂 You certainly will WMF relatives chime directly into confirm this can be still the latest case?

It means permitting they on the at the very least a number of the WMF sites. Whether it is section of center or an expansion isn’t really very related. The original RFC could have been filed with the idea of having it enabled into Wikipedia and loved ones, but Let me provides specific keyword on that about relevant WMF folk.

18+ discuter

  1. Do not know if this will be advised purely due to the fact a third team element, or for implementation towards the WMF options. If it’s for only 3rd parties, it might not actually you would like an RFC, and could maybe be achieved because an extension as well. If it’s to possess WMF development, we will have to look carefully into implications to own caching and you will results.

Giving a scientific perspective: the modern implementation of this particular feature hinges on particular transform so you’re able to the newest Parser returns therefore the Epidermis theme, and this need alter on the center. So you can to accomplish a comparable in an expansion, around still has to be some change in the new core – especially to own anchor viewpoints towards SkinEditSectionLinks hook up (meaning that all transform but the actual adding of one’s ‘share’ hook up would have to enter the core anyhow). I do believe as a result of this it can make much more experience to own this as the a core alter. It’s still configurable owing to $wgEnableSectionHeaderShare globally, that’s regarding automagically. In the event that worth is actually incorrect, no additional logic or JavaScript/CSS tips was invoked because of the ability.