- Poggio R, Gutierrez L, Matta Mg, ainsi que al. Every day salt consumption and you can CVD mortality about standard people: medical remark and you may meta-research off potential training. Social Wellness Nutr. 20ID: 24848764.
- Graudal N, Jurgens G, Baslund B, mais aussi alpared having common salt intake, low- and excessively-sodium diets was for the increased death: an excellent meta-data. Was J Hypertens. 20ID: 24651634.
- Suckling RJ, He FJ, Macgregor GA. Changed weight-loss salt intake to possess preventing and you will managing diabetic kidney condition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(12):CD006763. doi: 1858.CD006763.pub2. PMID: 21154374.
- Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Kandala NB, et al. Salt intake, coronary attack, and you will heart disease: meta-data regarding prospective degree. BMJ. 2009;339:b4567. doi: /bmj.b4567. PMID: 19934192.
- Aburto New jersey, Hanson S, Gutierrez H, et al. Effectation of improved potassium consumption towards cardiovascular exposure situations and you may problem: clinical feedback and meta-analyses. BMJ. 2013;346:f1378. doi: /bmj.f1378. PMID: 23558164.
- Phillips R, Hanchanale Compared to, Myatt A beneficial, et al. Citrate salts to own stopping and you may treating calcium supplements which includes renal stones for the grownups. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(10):CD010057. doi: 1858.CD010057.pub2. PMID: 26439475.
- Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, Campbell F, ainsi que al. Potassium supplementation to the handling of primary blood circulation pressure inside adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(3):CD004641. doi: 1858.CD004641.pub2. PMID: 16856053.
- Beyer FR, Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, ainsi que albined calcium supplements, magnesium and you can potassium supplementation into the management of number 1 blood pressure levels inside the grownups. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(3):CD004805. doi: 1858.CD004805.pub2. PMID: 16856060.
VIII. Review of Key Inquiries
[[AHRQ released an important questions to the Energetic Healthcare Web site having personal opinion. The latest EPC discreet and you will finalized the key questions after breakdown of the public comments, and you will type in regarding Secret Informants in addition to Technical Expert Committee (TEP). ]]
IX. Technology Pros
Tech Benefits make-up a multiple-disciplinary gang of scientific, content, and methodological professionals who provide input when you look at the identifying communities, treatments, evaluations, or outcomes and select sort of degree otherwise database to locate. He or she is picked to provide broad expertise and perspectives specific so you’re able to the subject under development. Divergent and conflicting viewpoints are common and you can considered wellness scientific commentary one contributes to a careful, associated clinical feedback. Thus, analysis issues, framework, and you can methodological ways do not fundamentally show this new viewpoints away from private technology and posts advantages. Tech Masters render recommendations on the EPC to recognize literature search tips and you can recommend remedies for specific things given that questioned of the EPC. Technical Positives don’t carry out investigation of any kind http://datingranking.net/nl/meetville-overzicht/ neither do they subscribe the written text of one’s report. They have not reviewed new declaration, but since given the opportunity to get it done through the fellow or public feedback procedure.
Tech Masters must reveal one monetary conflicts of interest higher than $10,100000 and every other associated team or elite issues interesting. Due to their unique logical or content systems, individuals are welcome so you’re able to serve as Tech Positives and those who establish with potential conflicts are retained. The Too and also the EPC work to harmony, would, otherwise decrease any potential problems of great interest identified.
X. Peer Reviewers
[[Fellow reviewers is greet to provide created statements towards draft report centered on its medical, articles, or methodological assistance. The new EPC considers most of the peer review statements towards write declaration in preparation of your own finally statement. Peer reviewers do not be involved in composing otherwise editing of one’s latest statement or any other facts. The past statement doesn’t always portray the latest viewpoints out of private writers. New EPC tend to over a disposition of all of the peer opinion statements. The fresh new state of mind from statements having clinical recommendations and you will technology briefs commonly feel had written 3 months after the book of proof statement.